[Ramrod]

Originally Posted by foreverwar

Rammy, you appear to be a little confused - I posted this, with a link to the clip, less than two hours after your OP.

He hoped there would be 20 Muslim MPs, God willing, and that within 30 years there would be a Muslim PM, God willing - he never stated that the all the MPs would be Muslim, God willing or the entire government (which he never said) would be Muslim, God willing; I think you are interpreting this in your own special way.

he stated that the whole parliment and the PM would be muslim

His "game-plan", according your post #50, also includes
"# Voted strongly for introducing ID cards. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly for Labour's anti-terrorism laws. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly against an investigation into the Iraq war. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly for replacing Trident. votes, speeches
# Voted for equal gay rights. votes, speeches"
Very anti-democratic, huh?

I know. I posted exactly the above myself, and commented on that a few pages ago, why are you reposting it and saying what I actually said back at me?

btw, you are very quick to point any slight discrepancies in posts that disagree with the information in the OP from the BNP site, but seem less keen to highlight the inaccuracies in the information in the OP from the BNP site, to wit -
a) Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain - which at no time in the 7 odd minutes of the speech was this called for.

I already stated that I believe the thread title to be an error on my part. Several pages back.....

b) The video speech in which Mr Malik made his remarks has now been released on the internet — nearly five months after the event. The suppression of the video was clearly designed to try and limit the damage to the ruling Tory and Labour elite - when in fact it was on the organisations website, and has been on YouTube for over three months, along with other videos from the conference.

I really don't care when it was released. I care about what is being said in it by a MP in a western democracies govt.

Your attitude appears to be "no matter what the evidence, he is guilty"

But the evidence suggests that he is hankering after a muslim parliment and PM. What evidence do you have to the contrary?

---------- Post added at 16:00 ---------- Previous post was at 15:57 ----------

Originally Posted by Maggy J

With all due respect this is still a democracy and provided he does not incite violence or promote intolerance or support terrorism then he is free to speak his opinion.

I'm not saying that he isn't free to voice his opinion (he is), I'm concerned that he is a MP in our govt holding such an opinion.....

---------- Post added at 16:02 ---------- Previous post was at 16:00 ----------

Originally Posted by Sir John Luke

As far as I am aware, Hitler rose to power on a wave of nationalism and prejudice against people of a certain religion, stoked up by an extreme right-wing party. Ring any bells?

But it's the complacency of people that probably helped him get to a position where he could sieze power....
(That, and the night of the long knives of course )