View Single Post
Old 21-03-2009, 14:04   #105
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,558
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod View Post
I agree, but what do you have to say about that labour MPs wishes for the future of this country's government?
"god willing"

---------- Post added at 12:48 ---------- Previous post was at 12:44 ----------

Ok m8, run away rather than address the points I have raised.
First the vid was a hoax
.....that was disproved
Then he merely joking
.....muslims probably don't joke with the words 'god willing'
Then I'm told 'don't worry, it will never happen'
......thats immaterial, we have an MP whos game plan would seem to be incompatable with our democracy.
Rammy, you appear to be a little confused - I posted this, with a link to the clip, less than two hours after your OP.

He hoped there would be 20 Muslim MPs, God willing, and that within 30 years there would be a Muslim PM, God willing - he never stated that the all the MPs would be Muslim, God willing or the entire government (which he never said) would be Muslim, God willing; I think you are interpreting this in your own special way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
Can I point out (even though it's been pointed out before), that he said "at this rate, the whole Parliament will be Muslim" as a joke (please see clip at 0:20), and he then said he could see a time when there would be a Muslim Prime Minister, not the "Total Islamification of Britain". Why is this any different from having a Jewish for a Catholic Prime Minister.

I think the thread title is totally misleading and inflammatory.
His "game-plan", according your post #50, also includes
"# Voted strongly for introducing ID cards. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly for Labour's anti-terrorism laws. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly against an investigation into the Iraq war. votes, speeches
# Voted very strongly for replacing Trident. votes, speeches
# Voted for equal gay rights. votes, speeches"
Very anti-democratic, huh?

btw, you are very quick to point any slight discrepancies in posts that disagree with the information in the OP from the BNP site, but seem less keen to highlight the inaccuracies in the information in the OP from the BNP site, to wit -
a) Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain - which at no time in the 7 odd minutes of the speech was this called for.
b) The video speech in which Mr Malik made his remarks has now been released on the internet — nearly five months after the event. The suppression of the video was clearly designed to try and limit the damage to the ruling Tory and Labour elite - when in fact it was on the organisations website, and has been on YouTube for over three months, along with other videos from the conference.

Your attitude appears to be "no matter what the evidence, he is guilty" - pointless trying to have a reasoned discussion on this, imho.
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote