View Single Post
Old 19-03-2009, 04:24   #442
cook1984
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 556
cook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud ofcook1984 has much to be proud of
Re: Have you received a letter from Davenport Lyons?

Quote:
Originally Posted by theasix View Post
They want me to provide some information about my router, manufacturer, model, how many letters and digits is used to protect my network etc.

then as I suggested in my letter written to them, they asked me to give them full names of people that lived with me at the time of this alleged infrigement. and if i know who could get access to my network - did i authorize that person and give full details of that person.
They are phishing for information here. You should not provide it. You are under no legal obligation to. If they want to build a case it is up to them to do the investigation, not you.

I would write back to them stating that you are unwilling to provide the information they have requested, and repeat your request to see any evidence they might have. You might also want to include an invoice for say 100 pounds, to cover your time and costs.

---------- Post added at 04:24 ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by theasix View Post
".... explain what inquiries you have made since receiving our letter of claim as to whether your internet connection was used to infringe our client's copyright..."
Tell them that you are still waiting to see any evidence they have so that you can investigate further. Be clear that if they want you to investigate, they will be charged at £100 per hour for your time. Ask them to agree to this in writing if they wish you to investigate.

Once more, state that you do not share the file, and that you did not authorise anyone else to share it, and that they have still not provided any evidence or identified any individual who may have infringed their client's copyright.
cook1984 is offline   Reply With Quote