View Single Post
Old 18-03-2009, 11:37   #5
superbiatch
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Age: 48
Services: Sky+, Sky Broadband and Talk
Posts: 3,819
superbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny star
superbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny starsuperbiatch has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to superbiatch
Re: The NHS's version of regulatory failure?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
I can't imagine that frontline staff didn't raise these issues with the appropriate managers on many occasions.

How on earth could this go on for so long??
Who's to say they didn't raise their issues? I know things have been brought to management attention in the past and not dealt with - i hear about it all the time from friends in the acute trust

I don't know how these things could go on for so long, what was their star rating? The star rating as much of a pain in the ass it is surely would have highlighted these concerns. Or did they lie?
superbiatch is offline   Reply With Quote