Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Hmm, the Phorm thread sort of went along the same lines as this. Starts off interesting, plenty of views thrown in (even by a member of the House of Lords) and then somehow the whole thing imploded.
This is a good thread and it's a bit disappointing to see it stall. Probing and inquisitiveness are a feature of a good forum but if we're going to sustain discussions on topics that draw in a crowd we might need a bit more 'netiquette' and mutual respect.
Differing views and opinions are what it's all about and I hope Mike keeps us updated on things; I for one am interested in the way it goes.
|
Of course. I don't want to get involved in particular points any more though.* To explore matters I put things both in the positive and negative sense to draw points and conclusions from differing angles and attempt to identify the techniques used to stall more general discussion, for this is an important subject poorly understood by the general public and confused by some that are more knowledgeable. Now at the stage of writing a dissertation to set out what I have discovered, I intend to deliver it to the forum once complete. The overall intention here is to help the majority, and in court, to get a formal judgement upon what seems to be a disgraceful approach to me as a customer.
* The tone contained in delivery of some posts has the appearance of something more than legitimate forum debate. I have noticed it in the later stages of other important threads on this forum, then they fade.