View Single Post
Old 15-03-2009, 18:06   #343
Jayceef1
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 23
Jayceef1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Legal action taken against Virgin Media throttling practices

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfs6600 View Post
Which is why STM is in place!!?? Ok, lets say you win and VM are for instance forced to remove STM, the network goes t**s up and everyone then gets slow speeds during the peak times as a result of the heavy users hogging all the bandwidth. The network gets unstable and more people have problems as a result of your actions. Thank you very much indeed kind sir. You may have won your court case but you fluffed the network up for the vast majority of users who have no problems at all.
Hear Hear. I can't understand what the OP wants to achieve by his action other than to line his pockets. Why are some people so selfish that they want everything for themselves at the expense of the majority.

---------- Post added at 18:56 ---------- Previous post was at 18:27 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_A View Post
Wrong Jamie. All these issues kick in at precisely the times STM does. In tests, access to these services goes back to normal when STM goes off. The only conclusion one can draw from tests is that STM has a wide effect on a contracted person's ability to use the Internet as intended.
Absolute rubbish. STM does not affect anything else. otherwise users on the 2Mb service would not be able to do anything even if STM did not exist (or even those who started their broadband life on a 512k connection). Far more likely that something else is causing the problem. On the rare times I have been affected by STM it has not stopped me from doing anything on the internet at all.

---------- Post added at 19:06 ---------- Previous post was at 18:56 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_SEO View Post
I don't think he meant user. I think he meant virgin media.
I think he meant the user.
Jayceef1 is offline   Reply With Quote