[Flyboy]

Originally Posted by rogermevans

that was introduced as the study says to help stop people hitting the back of stationary trafic beause of congestion it hope that it would impact shokwaves too but that wasnt why it was put there

its intention was overall to increase speed to relive the congestion

and ends with

Quote

No attempt has been made to validate the results reported. Users of the guidance are encouraged to assess the robustness of the results presented and the likely transferability of the case study to their own local environment.

Unquote

and in real terms has no relation ship to National speed limited lanes where a fifty uncontrolled limit would not be deployed intelligently when needed it would just be!

most lanes can be driven at 60 where they cant they should have thier speed reduced but the lanes i know where such a reduction woud be valid need much more than a 10mph drop

if i my beso bold if anything was going to be done it shouldbe that 60 should be stay as it is 50/40 be put in place by councils where needed and where no center line can be painted due to width a 30 limit be imposed

i think the police here will most likely agree with that

I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say here. Your message makes no sense, can you re-post with more clarity?

---------- Post added at 16:41 ---------- Previous post was at 16:32 ----------

Originally Posted by Gary L

The truth is that if there was absolutely no way that a pedestrian could get hurt or killed on any road in Britain. there would still be speed cameras plotted all over the place to raise revenue.

But it's not just pedestrians, it is other road users that are at risk as well.