Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_A
Thank you, Broadbandings, for your concise rebuff to what the Virgin Media and Telewest employees have stated on this forum. I am beginning to suspect they are using damage avoidance and obfuscation tactics.
The fact is that the term "unlimited" means just that, and not anything else as the Telewest employee has posted. So, be it contract, terms and conditions, or some other magic phrase Virgin Media want to mislead clients and potential clients about the one thing that shines in all their conduct so far, on and off list, is the obvious willingness to mislead people.
Additionally, whilst I am commenting generally, and not on the specifics of the case, some comments by Virgin Media and subsidiary company staff are bordering on something the court may wish to speak to Virgin Media about. Punitively.
I can well understand why Virgin Media would want to push someone off a case and protect their position viz-a-viz their constant deception.
They could, of course, be reasonable and fair to people. If they choose.
|
Hang on a minute Mike. The contributions over a long period of time of Virgin Media staff to this forum have been valuable and informative to the membership. I don’t see it serves the readership to gag their opinion either directly or indirectly.
Free speech is more important than saving a few bob on that which is paid for internet, or any other, services. I think people should be allowed to express their views with impunity provided Cable Forums’ own rules are observed. It will enrich the discussion.
Let everyone and anyone share their personal views and don’t beat them over the head for contributing to your interesting thread.