View Single Post
Old 05-03-2009, 17:13   #12
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Virgin high definition content

Quote:
Originally Posted by demented View Post
and virgin and their predecessors don't like to blow their trumpet/keep quiet/bad communication on good services they offer
Couldn't disagree more, Virgin since the rebrand have become experts at blowing sunshine up their own behinds, total opposite from the ntl days of mushroom treatment.

---------- Post added at 16:13 ---------- Previous post was at 16:12 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Had I the choice, I'd be opting for Virgin any day, as I am more likely to find HD material I actually want to watch on the VOD service than on most of the dodgy channels Sky has rushed into service just so the gullible muppets can brag about how much more they have.
Nice generalisation of all the people who took Sky HD there Chris. I think you'd be in the massive minority opting for VMTV over Sky if the decision involves HD in any way, shape or form though.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote