Thread: The VM HD Discussion Thread
View Single Post
Old 24-02-2009, 14:11   #9
sherer
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bromley
Age: 47
Posts: 2,688
sherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of societysherer is a pillar of society
Re: The VM HD Discussion Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Only 8.4%, you sure? Link please.
Based on the latest figures from Sky

http://corporate.sky.com/documents/0...eb126b6c09c7e1

The take up is 8.4%.

A lot of people have bought a new TV to replace the old CRT set and been more than happy with the freeview channels they get.

With the take up of HD being so small and VM being smaller than Sky anyway i'm not sure they can really afford to chuck money at HD without seeing the returns.
sherer is offline   Reply With Quote