Thread: V+ vs SKY+
View Single Post
Old 15-02-2009, 22:45   #8
oliver1948uk
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mansfield Woodhouse NG19
Services: VM Mix TV, 200 internet, basic house phone. Also Virgin mobile phone
Posts: 541
oliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quadsoliver1948uk has a fine set of Quads
Re: V+ vs SKY+

Quote:
Reports indicate the V+ is operationally slow and quite buggy. Seems to require frequent reboots and reformats.
I have had V+ used constantly for about 18 months. Never needed a reformat. Rarely needed a reboot. Never noticed it being 'buggy'. Always recorded everything it has been asked to record. Upscaled SD picture superb and (at the risk of starting the debate again), some well transmitted SD programmes look better than other not so well transmitted BBC HD programmes. Great to be able to record two progammes while watching another.
oliver1948uk is offline   Reply With Quote