Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
Perhaps she assumed common sense would subsequently be applied?
|
Why should she assume that?
Common sense wasn't applied the first time someone complained and she received a warning. She was told at that time that if she did something similar again she would be the subject of disciplinary action.
Surely that should have been warning enough that she was working in an occupation where, or for an employer for whom, the
preception of a 'professional' care service is more important than the carer's own
personal need to go the extra mile.
---------- Post added at 09:20 ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
If their actions were totally wrong for a second "offence", then surely they were totally wrong for giving a warning after the first "offence".
|
That's the way disciplinary procedures normally work though - you get a warning the first time, followed by action taken against you the second time.