|
Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek S
Ok so how would the following be prosecuted without eyewitnesses.
People driving through red-lights.
Someone attacking someone else but is stopped before any lasting injury is caused.
Someone seen breaking into a building and caught inside.
etc. etc.
You quite clearly haven't given your argument any thought whatsoever. In your world there would be no point in anyone going to court and giving evidence as you don't think they can be trusted.
|
answers
1-cctv[ static or in car will do]
2cctv-moile phone footage- forensic evidence-finger prints on weapon
3 caught in the act [with evidence ] is a little different to we saw him with a phone your worships [you can trust me i'm a copper]
you obviously haven't given much thought to your argument, in your world its hearsay to prison. no need for courts /magistrates /judges ,the police are the law judge and jury.. 
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|