|
Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek S
So in your eyes cops shouldn't be allowed to be witnesses then? Obviously everything they see is wrong and any evidence under oath is an attempt to stitch up the law abiding members of the public. 
On one hand in the believability stakes we have two Police officers, do you think they are going to perjure themselves and put their jobs and freedom on the line for a person using a mobile phone whilst driving.
On the other there is a convicted thug with umpteen convictions and an exceptionally dubious ability to own and drive expensive cars without ever having worked.
I know which I'd believe. |
having no evidence other than the word of even the most trusted officer is still having no evidence.
and convicted thug or not and no mater what he drives, he is at liberty because at this time he has not been convicted of any crime, what would this country become if a person could be convicted just because someone thinks he's guilty but has no evidence what so ever ..
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|