View Single Post
Old 28-01-2009, 16:47   #203
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Should smoking in cars carrying children be banned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004 View Post
"It doesn't matter if the car is moving or stationary, nor does it make a difference if a car's windows are up or down, said Const. Kevin O'Neil of Leamington police."



What does that say?
It says (to me) that they have no clue how they are going to enforce it, but are just saying they will.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermevans View Post
hmm why would detection rate decide if it is effective speed enforcement is most likely the least detected per occurrence of any law but even i wouldnt say that should mean not having some sort of speed laws in place

i doubt very much if police would miss other offences because of this one being on the books it would just be another one they can use if caught

the main idea behind this would be to get over that its not a good thing to do
People already know that it's not a good thing to do. Implementing another ban is not going to change that. I am saying that this proposed ban would be just another in a long line of difficult or impossible to enforce bans that this government has put in place.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote