Thread: wifi scanning
View Single Post
Old 27-01-2009, 22:48   #11
Matth
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
Matth has reached the bronze age
Matth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze age
Re: wifi scanning

Dimwitted channel planning, wrong equipment & settings or what.
http://paradigma.pt/ja/slog/index.ph...s-overlap.html
Bigger - http://paradigma.pt/ja/slog/wp-conte...hannel-map.JPG
For a start, the UK/ETSI allocation is 1-13, not 1-11, but there are too many only implementing / set to 1-11 to gain much from the 1-13 allocation.

A spacing of 5 is required for no overlap, giving the ever popular 1-6-11 layout.
A spacing of 4 has minimal overlap, giving the optimum 1-5-9-13 layout for the 13 channel allocation, though 9 tends to be the centre of microwave oven interference.
A spacing of 3 (some overlap) gives the compromise 1-4-7-11 4 channel lineup.

At a spacing of 2, one sideband fully overlaps another, so those using channel 3 in that setup are not doing anyone any favours, as they will be going badly over CH1 and moderately over CH6.

If not close to a CH11 user, then using CH13 may be better.
Matth is offline   Reply With Quote