RizzyKing

Everyone who has served in the military knows damn well in any operational planning there is a figure of acceptable civilian casualties and always has been only thing that differs is the amount pending on the army\regime planning the offensive action.

SMG was making a valid point and wasn't saying he agreed there should be civilian casualties but that it is an inevitable result of any nation conducting offensive operations.

We all want this to end sooner rather then later but as people posting on a forum what we may or may not want is neither here nor there and certainly isn't going to influence anyone or anything one iota so perhaps we can all remember this is a debate and have less of the personal attacks as most of us live in the UK where we are free to have whatever opinions or views we wish no matter how wrong or misguided they may seem to others. If one member really annoys you too much with their view\opinion then you use the ignore feature and problem is solved.