Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
" Most parents " ?
All children are at risk of damage to their health from second hand smoke, lung cancer does not discriminate class wise.
|
"I say the government should leave most parents to look after the welfare of their children and stop interfering, and help the children crying out for state intervention. Then perhaps it can look elsewhere for problems."
I meant "some parents" in general terms because some parents, it is patently obvious, do not look after their children's welfare.
They frequently figure in newspaper headlines. As far passive smoking goes, I'm asking for proof that it is a cause of lung cancer. Wouldn't we see many more cases of lung cancer amongst bar staff and spouses of smokers if so?
Quote:
|
A quick question,with respect, do you smoke?
|
No. Never saw the attraction. Health risks, cost, ashtray breath, etc, all put me off.