Quote:
Originally Posted by freezin
Not if it gets to the point of nannying it's not. Where do you think it should stop? Should alcohol be banned for example? Extreme sports?
I appreciate clothes that don't smell of cigarette smoke after a night at the pub too, but no one makes anyone go to a pub. If there had been a demand, there'd have been more smoke free pubs, and the ones that did exist prior to the ban would have been profitable enough for the idea to expand.
Urinating on somebody's coat isn't the same thing, is it? And would you be happy to pay the extra taxes that would inevitably result in a total ban?
|
Do you call making places we are all entitled to visit, this includes pubs you know, pubs are not just for smokers as you seem to be implying with your assertion that nobody makes you go to a pub.
With regard Urine, I was making the link between ammonia in cigarettes and ammonia that is naturally secreted form the body, both do not smell nice do they?
Would I be happy to pay more taxes if smoking was totally banned?
The way our country is at the moment we are all including our children going to be paying back a huge debt anyway, what difference would say 5p in the pound make?
The original question was should smoking in cars carrying children be banned and I still say yes.
---------- Post added at 19:17 ---------- Previous post was at 19:12 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by budwieser
"either your addiction is truely so bad you shouldnt be driving any way if you cant last till the end of a journy or it must be affect the way you drive which is breaking the law as it stands"
You`re talking crap mate, why shouldn`t a smoker have a smoke in the car if he`s on his own and how does it make his driving impaired.?  |
If the driver has pulled over to a safe place then why not?
If on the other hand theyre smoking as they're driving they may aswell be using a mobile phone.