Quote:
Originally Posted by rogermevans
you seem to miss my point the line is these people should not be CRBed they are not looking after children or vulnerable adults
Virgin can check their staff by other methods
to many seem to think the CRB is the answer to everything it is not and should not be
|
Just to clarify, in relation to Virgin not vetting people with a criminal record you stated "the line has been draw have a look at above CRB links". The OP asserts that this is incorrect, Virgin have not drawn a line. Whether this is true or not I don't know, it's just the OP's word.
Also you have stated that I missed your point "these people should not be CRBed". The point you contradicted me on was that Virgin had drawn a line, not that these people should not be CRBed. If you reread your comment you'll see that you never mentioned "these people should not be CRBed".
As for the people being CRBed or not being CRBed. As I stated previously I would not be happy with someone with a recent conviction for unprovoked violence cold calling my home. Do seriously think that this is out of order??? Whether this involves a CRB or not, I don't care, I just don't want someone with a recent history of unprovoked violence visiting me in my own home with the intention of trying to get me to buy something from him. Your obsession with CRB is entirely irrelevant to me.