Quote:
Originally Posted by cook1984
An update on my case against DL:
They have written to the court and asked to have another hearing because they claim they didn't have time to prepare their evidence and defence enough. They seem to be saying that because they lost they therefore must not have had enough time.
I'm not sure what the court will do. If there is another hearing I'm sure I will prevail, and they will just end up owing me even more money to cover time off work, registered post etc.
I am still trying to get reliable information on the ISP Davenport Lyons uses. If I can find an IP address I can tie to them, I can send them a copyright infringement notice and demand payment from them. At that point I will probably have to look for some pro-bono legal representation. Ideally it would go to court, because then DL would be in the position of having to prove that an IP address and a screenshot is not enough evidence to prove copyright infringement, which would be ironic to say the least  |
What a bunch of jokers
Hmm. Do you think they'd like that "defence" if it was the other way round, & someone that they had won a default judgement against had a whinge to the Court that they "didn't have enough time". Doubt it...
They would have had the standard amount of time, & would have had plenty of notice as to when they had to respond by, & when the actual County Court hearing would have been.
I hope the Judge sees through them
