Quote:
Originally Posted by photodude
Watchdog just back up everything I've said in this thread. The evidence IS flawed, and they are just trying it on  They have to prove it was the person named that copied and uploaded the file, not just their IP. And also prove it is/was on their computer. Without that, they have no case against you.
Hate to say it, but I told ya so   |
Indeed.
Re. the IP "evidence", do you (or anyone else) know if they actually connect to the defendant's IP as a peer to sample what they were allegedly seeding? Or do they simply rely on the IPs the tracker reports are in the swarm... which is hardly proof, seeing as it's a known fact that certain well known trackers deliberately insert innocent IPs into the swarm report?
Their evidence can't be too great, seeing as they have already dropped cases against people who protested their innocence, such as IIRC an old couple who were accused of sharing an Atari game? (the bad press from which is I assume what then caused Atari to drop DL).