View Single Post
Old 22-11-2008, 16:43   #20
Mick
Cable Forum Team
 
Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,134
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Mick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny starMick has a nice shiny star
Re: A Thread dedicated to the memory of Baby P

This story just gets worse and worse as now lawyers of the mother are applying for a new name for her at TAX payers expense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky News
Politicians have reacted angrily to claims the child's 27-year-old mother's lawyers are now preparing to invoke human rights legislation to assure her anonymity for life.

The Daily Mail says the mother's lawyers will argue that her life could be at risk if she is identified.

As well as a new identity, she could receive 24-hour police protection.

<snipped>

Conservative MP, Philip Davies, told the paper: "I personally find it rather offensive that the taxpayer may end up picking up a huge bill to protect this woman's human rights, given the complete disregard she showed for the human rights of her baby."
This is a massive insult to Baby P and his short life - he'll probably be turning in his grave at the thought of this.

I have always maintained that if someone is proved beyond reasonable doubt that they breached someones right to life, then that person who committed an evil act, loses all privileges and their absolute right to 'Human rights'.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...xpayer_Expense
Mick is offline