View Single Post
Old 29-10-2008, 19:58   #21
lemarsh
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Surrey
Age: 59
Posts: 510
lemarsh is a glorious beacon of lightlemarsh is a glorious beacon of lightlemarsh is a glorious beacon of lightlemarsh is a glorious beacon of lightlemarsh is a glorious beacon of lightlemarsh is a glorious beacon of lightlemarsh is a glorious beacon of light
Re: TV cheaper with Virgin than Sky?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick Fisher View Post
After over a year now with Sky+ I have to agree.

I was able to get a channel mix from Sky that was much more suited to my needs than I could with VM. It also worked out considerably cheaper for me too.

As my reception of VM DTV was atrociously bad, Sky, so far, for me, has been a win, win solution.

I live in hopes that it will continue in the same way.
Just to show we can all disagree - swapped from Sky to VM a few months ago, and would never go back. iplayer, additional capacity on V+ box, able to record 2 and watch another, free videos (XL), box owned by Virgin, so if it fails in 4 years time - then just get a free replacement (as opposed to buying a new one).

Don't get me wrong, there are a number of things I would prefer on Sky - HD (pathetic on VM), ability to use TV Eyes (and control box from another location), ability to use RF output (using HDMI) so able to split the output around the house, but overall VM over Sky anyday. And it is a lot cheaper for me, with more channels (Setanta sports free).
lemarsh is offline   Reply With Quote