View Single Post
Old 22-10-2008, 14:02   #66
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: Started as Proportional bills for a variable service?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Well, that was my whole point, I am in possession of the facts because I have taken the time to read what is publicly available, and offered to help those who may not know where to look so that they can be in possession of the facts also.

Please Gary, calm down, this is nothing personal.
I am calm. I promise you that I do not think that you are being personal
It would help if you were to try and not to post like it reads that here's some publically available links, and believe me I also have the facts.


Quote:
For the record then, VM have about 3.8M Broadband customers, just over 3M are cable, or thereabouts?. STM has been in force for over a year now?

Where are the masses of customer losses that appear to be a direct cause of the STM policy? Those figures I have quoted must surely show net decline quarter on quarter if the STM policy was causing migration?

All I can see is a few moaning about it here and on the official VM newsgroups, and yet they seem to scared of the alternative because they have not moved on to an alternative supplier.
would you agree that Virgin class those that upgrade their packages and have been given retention deals as new customers, and publish them as such?
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote