Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary L
What percentage are you of the total amount of customers?
what percentage of you and others that are getting full speed are of the total amount of customers?
what has you getting full speed got to do with what has been said about STM affecting peoples speeds when they are not affecting others speeds?
---------- Post added at 12:47 ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 ----------
You posted something that is available to all who want to read them. where's the facts that you are in possession of, that we might be able to see but have to take your word for?
|
Well, that was my whole point, I am in possession of the facts because I have taken the time to read what is publicly available, and offered to help those who may not know where to look so that they can be in possession of the facts also.
Please Gary, calm down, this is nothing personal.
For the record then, VM have about 3.8M Broadband customers, just over 3M are cable, or thereabouts?. STM has been in force for over a year now?
Where are the masses of customer losses that appear to be a direct cause of the STM policy? Those figures I have quoted must surely show net decline quarter on quarter if the STM policy was causing migration?
All I can see is a few moaning about it here and on the official VM newsgroups, and yet they seem to scared of the alternative because they have not moved on to an alternative supplier.