View Single Post
Old 21-10-2008, 13:41   #16
Arthurgray50@blu
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Arthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appealArthurgray50@blu has a bronzed appeal
Re: Richard Branson does not own Virgin Media.

I will put a spanner in the works here, Virgin has a well known brand, that is renowned for its trustworthyness, the name was created by Sir. Richard, and this is probabely the reason why NTL wanted to use it, to bring in more customers, but it has not worked, has it, the slagging off VM are getting now, Sir Richard would not put up with it, if VM did belong to him, would he, this is the reason why, VM (have already said) would sell the TV side, if the price was right, say 600million quid,
Arthurgray50@blu is offline   Reply With Quote