View Single Post
Old 15-10-2008, 12:02   #6
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,324
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: STM bull by the techs

Quote:
Originally Posted by brundles View Post
Of course the cynic in me also thinks that given the capacity issues we know VM have, a fix that can result in increased capacity usage of their network wouldn't be that high up the priority list - especially if (by standing back and monitoring) they think they can prove it only affects (or is only noticed by) 0.5% of their subscribers.
The cynic in me thinks that the Xmas freeze is coming and they might as well put it off until that's over and done with. the money saved on bandwidth can pay for all the staff parties.

They could always change the term STM to STMBeta for now.
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote