View Single Post
Old 14-10-2008, 11:30   #11
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: 2400 Mhz splitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy View Post
Just out of a technical interest from this post... Should unused ports/cable ends be terminated to stop signal bounceback???
Not only will you get microreflections from unterminated cable, it'll also act as an aerial to soak up RF noise from the surroundings, so yes, a terminator to both keep the port / cable RF sealed and soak up signal to prevent reflection is highly, highly advisable.

---------- Post added at 12:30 ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by qwqwek View Post
Thanks for the post Broadbandings.

Does i mean that 2400Mhz splitter is a better spec. than the 1000Mhz one.

How can i close off the unused ports?

Btw, are there any 1 to 3 splitters I can buy in the market?

Cheers
No, it just means it can carry a wider bandwidth, doesn't mean anything really for the range VM carry and it could actually be poorer at the job, depending on its' construction.

Close off ports with a terminator as above.

A 3 way splitter is indeed available but do bear in mind that all it is is a 2 way splitter with 1 port split again, so 1 port will have 3.5dB loss while the other 2 will lose 7dB. (Signal strength halved = 3dB + additional 0.5dB insertion loss)
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote