Quote:
Originally Posted by photodude
This is just drifting so off topic now, it's unreal. I've given advice to people dealing with Davenport Lyons, and it's getting hidden with this rubbish.
From now on, I'm keeping out of it. It's getting out of hand, and where child porn comes in to it, god only knows (other than shock tactics to try and prove a point).
Good luck to all you guys n gals fighting Davenport Lyons, lets hope some of what I said was useful.
|
Its you who went round in circles ansd then started confusing yourself while proving me right. The whole point of the debate this caused was that they will go after the account holder because thats allt he information they will get from the ISP. Just because the account holder did not download the game, does not mean case dropped as they would still have proof that the game was downloaded onto that computer. The child porn came in to back this up, which you also done nicely with your Shannon Mathews case.
Was in the middle of writing this before noticing what you said Russ. Although my point still stands.