Quote:
Originally Posted by photodude
The case in Dewsbury of Shanon Matthews comes to mind. Her mother was the internet account holder, registered tenant of the house, and bill payer (I know, because I know her neighbour). Yet it was her ******* boyfriend who downloaded the child porn. Did they arrest her for child porn offences? NO. WHY NOT? Because she did not commit the offence (though she was guilty of plenty of other things).
Here is a case found at random with google, and there are 1000's more like it
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/18/2213232 |
Isnt this what I have been saying. They will go after the account holder first as thats the first contact, but just because they are innocent, the offence has still took place on the computer, so they shouldnt just let it drop. What you just said backs this up as they arrested him for the child porn offences.