View Single Post
Old 07-10-2008, 16:33   #89
supremus
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: over here
Posts: 665
supremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation erasupremus has entered a golden reputation era
Re: Should smoking in cars carrying children be banned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C View Post
Why? You are claiming that passive smoking kills people. I am not denying that (I haven't seen evidence it kills people, but it is dangerous).
I actually didn't say it kills people, I said its effects are harmful.

Quote:
I am claiming that pollution from cars and other vehicles has killed people. Where's the difference? Both are apparently killing innocents.
One of the few things Maggy J got right was that cigarettes fall in the same category as chocolate, tea and coffee. A cigarette ban would not make civilization as we know it collapse the same way a ban on cars would, and there are many, many other reasons why the comparison between cigarettes and cars is completely false, if not outright dishonest.

Quote:
I am not defending drink driving (as I stated, it *has* killed a lot of people). I merely used it as an example of a reason why smoking is not a unique threat.
It's all about context, of course, and I think I made mine clear. If not, I have now.

Quote:
I also didn't introduce the examples of Tea and Chocolate you appear to take objection to.
No, it was Maggy J, but it was a correct comparison, so it's not one you should distance yourself from either.
supremus is offline   Reply With Quote