Cable Forum - View Single Post

Stabhappy · 01-10-2008, 02:36

I already find it annoying to be capped during peak hours in a non-overscribed area (even though it's a student town), and when I'm not STM'd I get complete rock solid 2400kb/s to NNTP servers - so why should I be imposed on more?

The answer isn't more restrictions, its VM actually paying for new hardware which can support users to the amount they can sign them up. Surely if some areas are oversubscribed, the answer is to FIX the problem - not pack more users into already congested routes.

01-10-2008, 02:36	#13
Stabhappy Inactive Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: South Wales Age: 36 Services: XXL BB + M Phone Posts: 485	Re: Which one would you prefer I already find it annoying to be capped during peak hours in a non-overscribed area (even though it's a student town), and when I'm not STM'd I get complete rock solid 2400kb/s to NNTP servers - so why should I be imposed on more? The answer isn't more restrictions, its VM actually paying for new hardware which can support users to the amount they can sign them up. Surely if some areas are oversubscribed, the answer is to FIX the problem - not pack more users into already congested routes.