Quote:
|
To reduce pressure on the ref I think there should be a third ref watching the screen/video evidence. The referee has already stopped play by blowing the whistle. The attacker has lost his advantage at this stage as the 'fouled' player is rolling on the floor holding his knee. The referee on the pitch can confer with the referee watching the video and within a few minutes you get a decision. It's either a penalty or a yellow card if the guy dived to try and con the ref.
|
I don't get why they don't do this, the technology has been there for years and it would hardly slow the game down at all. They could limit use to situations were the decision is important such as penalties and free-kicks in dangerous situations