Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr
Ah, was confusing the T&Cs with a minimum term 
But the whole argument over 'I've never signed nothing' doesn't hold water
The last time Virgin changed their T&Cs was in Feb 2007. By now I reckon that even the most relaxed court would judge a customer to have accepted them. Therefore the 30 day rule would be enforceable (especially as it applies to both side and therefore is not 'unfair') |
thats ok Ben, loads of people forget these basic rules, the best bet to get upto speed is to seriously look at the old bank charges cases and legal avenues it helped educate the consumer masses to these county court small claims and court rules etc.
CAG is a very good thing for this purpose have a read some time
http://search.virginmedia.com/result...er+contract&cr=
sure the 30 day rule clause is perfectly valid as it is legaly binding on both partys, not just the consumer, VM are just as tied to it as you are.
the fact some silly VM executive signed off on the removal of the
official "Electronic notice" was a very bad thing for VM though,
as NOW, legally Virgin Media
cant send you a simple EMail as an official 30 day notice of contract change for instance
only written signed and delivered paper/fax counts now and most consumers dont have or give out their fax No.s but VM do
