View Single Post
Old 31-08-2008, 13:32   #79
Toto
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,403
Toto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appeal
Toto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appealToto has a bronzed appeal
Re: Have you received a letter from Davenport Lyons?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy View Post

In the end the simple facts are if you don;t secure something then you will be responsible for it to some extent...
Oh I fully agree, its the "to some extent" that seems to be the key according to som interested parties in those articles.

I'm behind the law here in that trying to secure a conviction for copyright theft is the right thing to do, but playing devils advocate that on an unsecured wireless network there could be very reasonable doubt really makes me think.

---------- Post added at 13:32 ---------- Previous post was at 13:31 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by moaningmags View Post
Even with different modem MACs, the ubr only accepts 1 NIC MAC. So both won't get on at the same time.
Isn't the ip address assigned according to the NIC MAC and not the modem MAC?
It's assigned to both in concert, that is why you can have matching client MACS but not matching modem MACS.
Toto is offline   Reply With Quote