View Single Post
Old 30-08-2008, 18:54   #10
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sucks to be with comcast

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
But how long would it be, if VM imposed the same cap, that the comments about "this is not the unlimited that was advertised" started. do you think?

btw, on 10Mb/s, if I was continuously throttled, I could still download 720GB per month - so, swings and roundabouts (imho).
You hit what STM is all about, keeping the unlimited advertising running.

Yes you could download 720GB on 10Mbit, however for those who want to download anything less than 250GB, probably 99.9% of customers, a flat monthly cap is a better and less disruptive option than the present STM.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote