OK so it's changed from 'does not imply' in
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34629270-post261.html to saying that it 'could imply', punters won't be worrying, let the regulators worry about it and it doesn't require having a moan about.
Nothing more to say and glad you agree the ad is potentially misleading even if you don't consider it merits having a moan about - some people do.
I don't care that much, however I know the ASA adjudication well as I was one of the members of the public who complained to the ASA about it as I have done other misleading adverts about broadband, it being what I know and what I do and I dislike seeing the public, including me, ripped off on the basis of dubious ads
