View Single Post
Old 27-08-2008, 15:36   #24
dev
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,164
dev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond reputedev has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Comcast's Approach To Congestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Ad View Post
I would welcome congestion based measures, infact one of my early arguments against STM was why it was installed on UBRs in areas that had no congestion problems, my own is only 22% utilised the last 2 times I asked, why STM me and my neighbours at all? I could run 20 meg day and night and not cause anyone a problem (based on their insulting propaganda about how everyone downloading over a long period would adversely affect other people). We all know why now, its all for the sake of capacity numbers in some stupid spreadsheet.
problem with that is, people in the uk like to complain when someone appears to have something better, imagine the nightmare of people phoning and asking why they get STM'd before someone they know?
dev is offline   Reply With Quote