View Single Post
Old 26-08-2008, 11:48   #6
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Comcast's Approach To Congestion

Please could this be merged with http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/63...fairer-stm.htm

Caching and 'tracker optimisation' has been happening for a while, P2P flows being redirected to on-net peers to save transit bandwidth. Potentially while P4P makes some intrusion easier it's fairly trivial still for ISPs to poke into P2P flows, especially with the sub-standard encryption that's employed in such clients. Worst case ISPs could even proxy the encryption transactions if they had to.

This is quite an interesting technology actually, I might have to do some reading into it and educate myself a bit
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote