Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter N
Except for a big dent in BT's reputation, Phorm losing millions off their share value, the ICO and the UK government being forced to explain their actions to the EU Commissioner and the shareholders who have lost a fortune, BT staff being forced to lie to customers...
...wait a minute - none of that would have happened if we hadn't discovered the secret trials.
That means it's all our fault. Oops.
|
What is the most disturbing is none are willing to be truely transparant, they all are hiding something in the closet.
1, BT are not 100% sure or Emma wouldn't have been so uncomfortable answering the questions. She did put on a good show but anyone can see certain questions made her feel uncomfortable. Leads people to belive there is some economy with truth possibly.
2. Actions since the trials hit the news leads most to think there is something not totally legal going on since at the start, all kept passing the book on this. Government, BT, Phorm, Police and the abscence of Privacy International would make most think there was large payments going around to make some look the other way.
3. Refusal by some to give all information on a FOI almost seals this method of thinking, that someone has something to hide. The excuse of PRIVACY doesn't cut when it includes that our Privacy is placed at risk.
4.Phorm's past history doesn't improve the situation since the links to illegal activity is very strong.
5. BT failed even after this was in the public eye to address the situation, with customers or shareholders.