Quote:
Originally Posted by HamsterWheel
Florence
When all links show Phorm as being a company of may paths, mirror servers and most placed outside the EU? THAT IS JUST EARLY SUPPOSITION - WAIT UNTIL WEBWISE IS PROPERLY LAUNCHED TO CONDEMN IT FOR THAT.
How having an adserver based in China protects me from unanted invaision of my privacy? AGAIN, JUST EARLY SUPPOSITION.
How intercepting my browsing gives me a choice when the interception is ISP side? WHO CLAIMED IT GAVE YOU A CHOICE ? YOU HAVE A CHOICE NOT TO USE IT.
Why if this is soo good you Haven't launched your own ISP with this as the main attraction for cheaper Internet surfing ?( This taken from words Kent has spoken no ISP has ever said they would lower prices for acepting this)
If a customer doesn't opt-in is the browsing still going to be intercepted? NOW YOU'RE BEING SILLY - HOW CAN I TAKE ON BT WHEN BT INVESTED BILLIONS ?
Answer those without PR spin and we can have a meaningful debate. I'M NOT A PR PERSON
PS, YOU'D COME ACROSS A LOT BETTER IF HALF OF YOUR POSTS DIDN'T HARP ON ABOUT BT'S BOSSES PAY. THAT IS A MATTER FOR THEIR SHAREHOLDERS - IF YOU'RE NOT ONE, THEN FRANKLY THAT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
|
Since the amount of control Shareholders have over this company is in doubt the amount the BT Execs are paid is partly relevant to this debate.
How about some facts, instead of more spin & rhetoric?