[Rchivist]

Originally Posted by Florence

Well it seems the HO do understrand the privacy when it comes to requested what went on between them , phorm and BT yet they feel we are not entitled to the same respect for ours.

This information might be too incriminating for BT, phorm and last the HO it should be released it is dealing with our privacy! Something that the HO has shown none. If they cannot understand why we are in arms about our privacy maybe they should re-read their reasons for not releasing the information. Then think just maybe this is why we don't want phorm invading our privacy for adverts.

If they can say it is ok for Phorm to be used the argument for with holding this info has no legal standing since we have no rights to privacy according to HO neither has phorm, BT of who ever at the HO who answered those. Time to appeal.

Which ISP did they use for the communications? Was there DPI being used? Maybe their communications got intercepted? There might even have been a secret trial going on at the time that the Home Office weren't told about and the communications might not have been secure.