Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
Home Office FoI releases uploaded, and my current conclusions updated.
http://www.dephormation.org.uk/?page=12
This FoI release confirms - the Home Office were advised about Phorm as early as November 2006.
Shortly after the 2006 trials.
They remained in correspondence with Phorm through 2007, up to the launch in February 2008.
They haven't released any details of the correspondence other than dates. |
Well it seems the HO do understrand the privacy when it comes to requested what went on between them , phorm and BT yet they feel we are not entitled to the same respect for ours.
This information might be too incriminating for BT, phorm and last the HO it should be released it is dealing with our privacy! Something that the HO has shown none. If they cannot understand why we are in arms about our privacy maybe they should re-read their reasons for not releasing the information. Then think just maybe this is why we don't want phorm invading our privacy for adverts.
If they can say it is ok for Phorm to be used the argument for with holding this info has no legal standing since we have no rights to privacy according to HO neither has phorm, BT of who ever at the HO who answered those. Time to appeal.