Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderballs
No I have not.
"use of material" applies to attachments or pictures videos etc. Not words. And dont make me laugh - they try to get people to subscribe to their porn channels too
|
Actually, that phrase can be applied to words as well.
Quote:
|
"malicious mail" As outlined above - the email did not name a person was not addressed to a person.
|
Without seeing the email, I cannot comment on it, but an email does not need to be addressed to, or name a person to be malicious. It's entirely possible to send an email to an email address for a department that is malicious. I've seen a few..
Quote:
And moreover without understanding both "sides" how on earth could they reasonably assess it was anything ?
The fact people have to go to these lengths to sqeeze out some obscure bit of the T+Cs etc t ocome up for a reason Virgin would remotely botther with this if they had considered it for more than 5 seconds just shows how absurd it is.
|
Again, without seeing the email, I cannot comment on it, but VM's terms and conditions are hardly obscure. So it is not a fact that "people have to go to these lengths" because those people just went to
http://www.virginmedia.com, clicked the appropriate link and read. Hardly any length at all.
The fact is that someone read the email sent from your account, found it offensive in some way. They reported it to VM who would have had to read it to find the IP it was sent from. VM obviously agreed it was in some way offensive and acted.
Quote:
Anyway that department are getting it with two barrels from me now.
Might make them think twice before they send these threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, offensive letters to their customers.
|
Doubtful. They are a department who is cutting people off all the time. At best, if your email is too offensive, it will be ignored.