Originally Posted by Thunderballs

No I have not.

"use of material" applies to attachments or pictures videos etc. Not words. And dont make me laugh - they try to get people to subscribe to their porn channels too
In your opinion

"malicious mail" As outlined above - the email did not name a person was not addressed to a person.
Mr Splitting-Hairs appears to be visiting your house - from what you have stated, an email was sent from your VM connection, whether it was to a department, a person, or a general email account, it was intended to be read by someone.

And moreover without understanding both "sides" how on earth could they reasonably assess it was anything ?

The fact people have to go to these lengths to sqeeze out some obscure bit of the T+Cs etc t ocome up for a reason Virgin would remotely botther with this if they had considered it for more than 5 seconds just shows how absurd it is.
As stated below by another poster, 2 clicks away is hardly "obscure". btw, perhaps if you read the T&Cs fully, your definition of "absurd" may change (but probably not).

Anyway that department are getting it with two barrels from me now.
Yes, because that approach has worked so well for you so far.....

Might make them think twice before they send these threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, offensive letters to their customers.
Nothing anyone says on this thread is going to amend your viewpoint, is it?