Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
|
thats very interesting ass they have always denied knowing the URL you visit.
you can take that one stage further, what about keeping search engine URL's with the search data in them?
peter
---------- Post added at 08:50 ---------- Previous post was at 08:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilago
The correct term is Without Prejudice and it should be at the top of the letter centred, in bold, above the Dear Sir/Madam bit. 
With the NebuAd and Phorm lobbying about to get off the ground in the US, I would suggest you prepare for an onslaught of anti-Google, anti-social-networking (MySpace, Facebook etc.) propaganda. It will be designed to demonstrate how lilly-white and clean NebuAd and Phorm really are, while these other organisations have been really doing worse than them for years.
It might be a very good idea to prepare well thought out rebuttals. This sort of informercial stuff usually does get into the mainstream.
The Netflix DeAnonymiser algorithm is one place to start on unravelling their arguments on anonymity. The Gator connections to NebuAd and Phorm's previous life as 121Media "rootkit installer", origins should be useful as well. |
in my house / networks all of the following are banned
search engine browser addins (spyware), social networking sites (virus and security risk),nice big hosts file to block majority of ads, and only me and the wife have unfiltered web access
peter