Peter N

Feesch's post and writing style are getting more familiar now. He is not here to make any relevent points and is trying to divert your attention.

Notice the degeneration of his basic ability to write in English during a Saturday evening and you'll soon understand...

Come meet me for a coffee, think you will find there are plenty of us with media and technology industry who are prepared to work these issues through in a little more detail then merely an online petition and a faceless thread...

Plenty of us with media - that's not even remotely grammatical

Think the number maybe wrong there, but assuming you mean the questions around:

was 'PeopleonPage' ethical and did I agree that videoed discussion should have been censored/unreleased?

...nor is that

Its not quatity, its quality. All posters, TV sets will get a digital connection - you are seeing "online" as pure browser-based PC activity. The same technology putting ads in browsers will put them on mobiles and digital TV and outdoor.

That is ungrammatical, mispelled and very badly written especially when compared with his earlier posts.

Did I not say there were "many"? Was a statement against a narrow-minded point of view - and you yourself are running media down as some lesser actvity. So thanks!

Point being no-one here wants isolation, its a debate isn't it - and and am not pushing wares, but happy to look at both points of view - and happy to bring a different perspective.

That is ungrammatical, badly written, poorly spelled and aggresive.

Good money says that he had a few - probably Stella judging by the attitude shift.

As the wife would say - "leave him - it's not worth it"