Back on topic please guys
---------- Post added at 08:36 ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
If VM could check that easily, Would you not think they would be able to stop the clones in the first place.
The fact of the matter is someone WILL get a letter even when they have not been using P2P but the **** bag who has cloned there modem and IS using P2P will not.
It kinda makes a mockery of all this.
|
Perhaps then the emphasis (on VM as ADSL doesn't have this problem) should be for the ISP to first confirm that the person they're sending out the letters too are the account holders of the account used for file sharing. For gawd sake if they worked out how to do that they'd not only get the BPI off thier backs but also the cloners off thier networks... Perhaps a centralised DHCP bank is in order???
I know that the original letters did say about disconnection, these were altered after the initial news reports to be a general educational/guide as to someone on your account may be file sharing and were not a definative accusation like the original.
Kymmy