Hank

Odd... "Considering a qualified exemption/s and the Public Interest Test."?

So the Force Solicitor may have issued a legal opinion on the actions by BT and Phorm whilst conducting the 'Phorm Trials' in 2006 and 2007, but what that opinion actually is might not be shared because to do so might not be in the public interest?

So if the Force Solicitor thought it was legal what might that cause in terms of issues against the public interest? Answers on a postcard (or maybe you should seal your answers in an envelope for privacy reasons)

Or, what if the solicitor said it was illegal as per the papers by our eminent colleagues in this campaign? How would disclosing that under FOI be against the public interest? (Other than showing that the police may have ignored something which their force solicitor said could be against the law?)

Looking forward to seeing the answers...